CNReviews: “Which China Twitterati are Twittering the Most”?
This has to be some kind of a record for self-referential narcissism clustered on the use of what could easily prove to be a faddish Web app. Active China-based users of Twitter, who’ve apparently been identified and placed on a list by major Twitter-addict Christine Lu (the California-based founder of the China Business Network) have now been subjected to a sort of statistical analysis by my buddy Elliott Ng here. Elliott contributes to the group blog CNReviews, where his study is posted. Joining him in this blog project is the proudly polyglot, Chinese-born Swiss national Mac enthusiast named David Feng who, as is easily discerned by the content of his prolific posts on Twitter, has what I’d charitably describe as an unusual obsession with Beijing’s subway lines and stations. David, who I’ve not yet met, was also one of the organizers of a Beijing “Tweet-up,” in which addicts gathered in a local English-language bookstore/lending library and — you got it — sent Twitter messages to one another and to others who happened to be following them.
Each to his own, of course. But am I wrong in thinking that there’s something not quite healthy and weirdly solipsistic about this? Mind you, I do find Twitter useful, as I made clear in a post of mine last week — a post which, as if to prove the point it made, rode a wave of Twitter-distribution to become one of my most widely-read posts to date. But if we all start looking like a bunch of excitable dorks (which many clearly are) we’ll scare away people who actually might make truly useful contributions — links to great stories, life hacks, great recommendations on apps or software or books or eats, real insights into the things that matter: things predicated on actually having a life.
13 comments thus far
Existential question: If you make reference to a self-referential posting, does that make the posting less self-referential? (Or does it make your posting more self-referential?)
Posted by Thomas Crampton on April 28, 2008 at 2:45 pm
Pushing information.
Much like China blogging, a scene which celebrates itself, yet also a scene which brings huge informational advantages when correctly filtered.
Posted by Alex on April 28, 2008 at 2:48 pm
@Tom - I makes it “meta-self-referential,” doesn’t it? And yes, really sort of inexcusable, huh?
Posted by Kaiser Kuo on April 28, 2008 at 2:50 pm
I’ve said it before but Twitter moves in mysterious ways. It’s also completely contextual and so there are very few people who use it for exactly the same reasons.
This is why there are a few hundred people who follow me with no reciprocity at all. Twitter is completely safe and unlike Puppies can be bought just for Christmas or whenever it suits folks.
I’ve had plenty of time to think about this as you might have gathered
Posted by Charles Frith on April 28, 2008 at 3:04 pm
there’re some guys almost post once a second, and eventually cause me…. not crazy, but de-followed
Posted by isaac on April 28, 2008 at 3:08 pm
riding on the wave of this post, just wanted to drop by and annoy you a bit more. here we go, are you ready?
tweet.
heh. i do feel like i have split personalities sometimes. every social media app i’ve gotten turned onto and addicted to has been an interesting lesson where on one hand, i look at all this from a few steps back and find it a fascinating experiment in social interaction on so many levels. ok, so now that i have 1K+ followers what does that mean. let’s retweet and find out. let’s throw out a question that has nothing to do with anything in particular and see who bites with a reply. let’s create a China Twitterati list (inspired by Guy’s on alltop.com) and see if we can build a little twitter bridge between China and those who have no clue about it. check. check. check.
on the other hand, i find myself diving right in to see what the fuss is about and getting addicted after i “get” what all the fuss was about.
that’s not twitter. it’s my personality by nature and twitter just brings it out. you should have seen me back in the days when i was sent to Home Shopping Network headquarters. i would spend my days learning about the behind the scenes smoke & mirrors of the world of tv shopping…then as the weeks go by, find myself watching the same shows late at night and reaching for the phone to call now before the stupid thing i really didn’t need was sold out.
twitter really is what you make of it. i think the vibe you’re picking up on with the “China Twitterati” is an energy and excitement of having an app that has allowed people to plug in and connect with each other and those they would otherwise never meet or know. it’s cool to see mike arrington ask something out loud and have folks such as yourself be able to reply directly to him with the real china deal. prior to twitter, i can tell you their china stories were a lot less in depth than they are now.
the observer part of me thinks that’s pretty damn cool…and the twitter addict in me needs to go tweet about it now.
Posted by Christine Lu on April 28, 2008 at 3:22 pm
to me.. twitter serves as a great way to learn about a person without/before meeting him/her..
also, information gathering/spreading.. basically the same as above.. but still..
Posted by Tan Chu on April 28, 2008 at 3:52 pm
I check the profiles before I follow someone and allow them to send direct to me. No haz no home biz opportunities pleez. Saw a great article on dating via Twitter. Sounds fun, but your live dinner/follow-up chatter is likely to be a tad brief.
We were once a 5 minute society, now we do things in 140 words or less–well, some of us.
Posted by Lonnie on April 28, 2008 at 4:05 pm
[...] are always a problem to new digital commons spaces. There is a very good chance Twitter, a “faddish web app“, could be the CB radio of Web 2.0 if it can’t find a way to scale with its new-found [...]
Posted by Andrew Lih » Blog Archive » The Point of Twitter on April 28, 2008 at 6:54 pm
[...] Digital Watch, Kaiser Kuo wrote an excellent post discussing the trend of blogging about Twitter as dangerous self-referential narcissism and the risks of “excitable dorkitude,”: Each to his own, of course. But am I wrong in [...]
Posted by Which China Twitterati are Twittering the most? on April 28, 2008 at 11:42 pm
[...] myself also am a big Subway kind of guy (thanks, Kaiser), so I often dip my head into local metro forums. What’s interesting in these forums is the [...]
Posted by Raccolta Online » A Thing of Bad Faith? Beijing’s Media and Subway Experiencing Mutual Delays in Trust on June 30, 2008 at 10:13 am
[...] 2: Do not take this stuff too seriously or risk the charge of self-reflective narcissism. On the other hand, if you find this stuff interesting, then you are truly in the social media echo [...]
Posted by How does the T-List Twitterati Use Twitter? - Travel Industry News - UpTake Blog on July 15, 2008 at 7:39 am
When you know someone who clearly is a narcissist, their twitter patter is absolutely fascinating and repulsive at the same time. I know someone who lies about his age, marital status, child (existence of), his job, well everything. And I can on SEE from his twitter space that he’s STALKING via twitter, he responds to the three women he’s got his eye on with contrived witty self serving crap. Twitter is an enabler for the creepy sociopaths of the world. These women have no idea.
Posted by Shellee on August 17, 2008 at 1:12 am
Post a new comment